Rippling ATS vs Todoist
A head-to-head comparison to help you pick the right tool
Last updated: April 30, 2026
Rippling ATS
Rippling Recruiting is the applicant tracking module within the Rippling platform. It connects recruiting directly to onboarding, payroll, and IT provisioning so that when a candidate is hired, their entire employee setup happens automatically. Rippling ATS is ideal for companies already using Rippling for HR who want a seamlessly integrated recruiting experience.
Todoist
Todoist is a clean and intuitive task management app trusted by millions of individuals and teams. It focuses on simplicity and getting things done with natural language input and smart scheduling.
Pros
- ✓Seamless connection from hiring to onboarding to payroll — zero manual handoff
- ✓Automatically provisions IT accounts and equipment when a candidate is hired
- ✓Deep integration with the full Rippling platform
- ✓Eliminates duplicate data entry across HR systems
Cons
- ✗Only valuable if you use the full Rippling platform
- ✗Requires custom pricing quote
- ✗Less feature-rich as a standalone ATS compared to dedicated tools like Greenhouse
- ✗Overkill for companies not using Rippling
Pros
- ✓Extremely easy to use
- ✓Natural language task input
- ✓Cross-platform availability
- ✓Good collaboration for small teams
- ✓Generous free plan
Cons
- ✗Not suited for complex project management
- ✗Limited reporting and analytics
- ✗Gantt and timeline views absent
- ✗Better for individuals than large teams
Rippling ATS vs Todoist: Side by Side
| Factor | Rippling ATS | Todoist |
|---|---|---|
| User Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Category | Applicant Tracking | Project Management |
| Pricing Model | Paid | Freemium |
| Starting Price | Custom pricing | Contact for pricing |
| Best For | Companies using Rippling for HR who want recruiting seamlessly connected to onboarding and payroll | Individuals and small teams wanting a simple, clean task manager without the complexity of full project tools |
| Our Pick | — | — |
Rippling ATS Features
- ✓Job posting
- ✓candidate pipeline
- ✓interview scheduling
- ✓offer management
- ✓automated onboarding trigger
- ✓payroll integration
- ✓IT provisioning
- ✓analytics
Todoist Features
- ✓Task management
- ✓project organization
- ✓due dates
- ✓priority levels
- ✓labels
- ✓integrations
- ✓mobile app
Pricing Comparison
Our Take
Choose Rippling ATS if companies using rippling for hr who want recruiting seamlessly connected to onboarding and payroll. Choose Todoist if individuals and small teams wanting a simple, clean task manager without the complexity of full project tools.
Best For
Companies using Rippling for HR who want recruiting seamlessly connected to onboarding and payroll
Best For
Individuals and small teams wanting a simple, clean task manager without the complexity of full project tools
Also Consider
If neither Rippling ATS nor Todoist is the right fit, Manatal is worth evaluating.
Manatal
Recruitment agencies and budget-conscious companies wanting AI-powered ATS at an affordable price
From $15/user/mo
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between Rippling ATS and Todoist?
Rippling ATS is best for companies using rippling for hr who want recruiting seamlessly connected to onboarding and payroll. Todoist is best for individuals and small teams wanting a simple, clean task manager without the complexity of full project tools.
Which is better, Rippling ATS or Todoist?
Choose Rippling ATS if companies using rippling for hr who want recruiting seamlessly connected to onboarding and payroll. Choose Todoist if individuals and small teams wanting a simple, clean task manager without the complexity of full project tools.
How much does Rippling ATS cost?
Rippling ATS starts at Custom pricing. Pricing model: Paid.
How much does Todoist cost?
Visit Todoist website for current pricing.
Who should use Rippling ATS?
Companies using Rippling for HR who want recruiting seamlessly connected to onboarding and payroll
Who should use Todoist?
Individuals and small teams wanting a simple, clean task manager without the complexity of full project tools