SoftwareDuel

Bullhorn vs Greenhouse

A head-to-head comparison to help you pick the right tool

Last updated: April 30, 2026

Bullhorn

Bullhorn is the leading ATS and CRM platform built specifically for staffing and recruiting agencies. It combines applicant tracking with client relationship management in one purpose-built system.

Paid
Get Pricing →

Greenhouse

Greenhouse is a leading applicant tracking system built for structured, data-driven hiring. It helps companies design consistent interview processes, reduce bias, and make better hiring decisions. Greenhouse is the ATS of choice for mid to large companies with high-volume or technical hiring needs.

PaidFrom Custom pricing
Get Pricing →

Pros

  • Purpose-built for staffing agencies
  • Strong CRM and client management
  • Excellent pipeline visibility
  • Deep integration with job boards
  • Good mobile app

Cons

  • Not ideal for in-house recruiting teams
  • Can be expensive
  • Interface has a learning curve
  • Customization requires technical knowledge

Pros

  • Best-in-class structured hiring tools with scorecards and interview kits
  • Extensive integration ecosystem with 300+ HR and productivity tools
  • Powerful reporting and hiring analytics
  • Strong DEI tools to reduce bias in hiring

Cons

  • Expensive for small companies with limited hiring volume
  • Complex to set up and requires dedicated admin resources
  • No built-in HRIS — requires integration with a separate HR system

Bullhorn vs Greenhouse: Side by Side

FactorBullhornGreenhouse
User RatingN/AN/A
CategoryApplicant TrackingApplicant Tracking
Pricing ModelPaidPaid
Starting PriceContact for pricingCustom pricing
Best ForStaffing and recruiting agencies needing a combined ATS and client CRM platformMid to large companies with high-volume hiring
Our Pick

Bullhorn Features

  • Applicant tracking
  • CRM for recruiters
  • resume parsing
  • candidate sourcing
  • reporting and analytics
  • integrations

Greenhouse Features

  • Job postings
  • candidate tracking
  • interview scheduling
  • reporting
  • integrations

Pricing Comparison

Bullhorn

Paid

Contact for pricing

See full pricing →

Greenhouse

Paid

Starts at Custom pricing

See full pricing →

Our Take

Choose Bullhorn if staffing and recruiting agencies needing a combined ats and client crm platform. Choose Greenhouse if mid to large companies with high-volume hiring.

Best For

Staffing and recruiting agencies needing a combined ATS and client CRM platform

Best For

Mid to large companies with high-volume hiring

How Bullhorn and Greenhouse Are Similar

  • Both are Applicant Tracking platforms designed for business teams
  • Both offer web-based access with no software installation required
  • Both provide customer support and onboarding resources
  • Both integrate with popular third-party business tools
  • Both offer a trial or demo to evaluate before purchasing

Also Consider

If neither Bullhorn nor Greenhouse is the right fit, Manatal is worth evaluating.

Manatal

Recruitment agencies and budget-conscious companies wanting AI-powered ATS at an affordable price

From $15/user/mo

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between Bullhorn and Greenhouse?

Bullhorn is best for staffing and recruiting agencies needing a combined ats and client crm platform. Greenhouse is best for mid to large companies with high-volume hiring.

Which is better, Bullhorn or Greenhouse?

Choose Bullhorn if staffing and recruiting agencies needing a combined ats and client crm platform. Choose Greenhouse if mid to large companies with high-volume hiring.

How much does Bullhorn cost?

Visit Bullhorn website for current pricing.

How much does Greenhouse cost?

Greenhouse starts at Custom pricing. Pricing model: Paid.

Who should use Bullhorn?

Staffing and recruiting agencies needing a combined ATS and client CRM platform

Who should use Greenhouse?

Mid to large companies with high-volume hiring

Bullhorn vs Greenhouse (2026) | SoftwareDuel