Greenhouse vs Bullhorn
A head-to-head comparison to help you pick the right tool
Last updated: April 30, 2026
Greenhouse
Greenhouse is a leading applicant tracking system built for structured, data-driven hiring. It helps companies design consistent interview processes, reduce bias, and make better hiring decisions. Greenhouse is the ATS of choice for mid to large companies with high-volume or technical hiring needs.
Bullhorn
Bullhorn is the leading ATS and CRM platform built specifically for staffing and recruiting agencies. It combines applicant tracking with client relationship management in one purpose-built system.
Pros
- ✓Best-in-class structured hiring tools with scorecards and interview kits
- ✓Extensive integration ecosystem with 300+ HR and productivity tools
- ✓Powerful reporting and hiring analytics
- ✓Strong DEI tools to reduce bias in hiring
Cons
- ✗Expensive for small companies with limited hiring volume
- ✗Complex to set up and requires dedicated admin resources
- ✗No built-in HRIS — requires integration with a separate HR system
Pros
- ✓Purpose-built for staffing agencies
- ✓Strong CRM and client management
- ✓Excellent pipeline visibility
- ✓Deep integration with job boards
- ✓Good mobile app
Cons
- ✗Not ideal for in-house recruiting teams
- ✗Can be expensive
- ✗Interface has a learning curve
- ✗Customization requires technical knowledge
Greenhouse vs Bullhorn: Side by Side
| Factor | Greenhouse | Bullhorn |
|---|---|---|
| User Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Category | Applicant Tracking | Applicant Tracking |
| Pricing Model | Paid | Paid |
| Starting Price | Custom pricing | Contact for pricing |
| Best For | Mid to large companies with high-volume hiring | Staffing and recruiting agencies needing a combined ATS and client CRM platform |
| Our Pick | — | — |
Greenhouse Features
- ✓Job postings
- ✓candidate tracking
- ✓interview scheduling
- ✓reporting
- ✓integrations
Bullhorn Features
- ✓Applicant tracking
- ✓CRM for recruiters
- ✓resume parsing
- ✓candidate sourcing
- ✓reporting and analytics
- ✓integrations
Pricing Comparison
Our Take
Choose Greenhouse if mid to large companies with high-volume hiring. Choose Bullhorn if staffing and recruiting agencies needing a combined ats and client crm platform.
Best For
Mid to large companies with high-volume hiring
Best For
Staffing and recruiting agencies needing a combined ATS and client CRM platform
How Greenhouse and Bullhorn Are Similar
- •Both are Applicant Tracking platforms designed for business teams
- •Both offer web-based access with no software installation required
- •Both provide customer support and onboarding resources
- •Both integrate with popular third-party business tools
- •Both offer a trial or demo to evaluate before purchasing
Also Consider
If neither Greenhouse nor Bullhorn is the right fit, Manatal is worth evaluating.
Manatal
Recruitment agencies and budget-conscious companies wanting AI-powered ATS at an affordable price
From $15/user/mo
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between Greenhouse and Bullhorn?
Greenhouse is best for mid to large companies with high-volume hiring. Bullhorn is best for staffing and recruiting agencies needing a combined ats and client crm platform.
Which is better, Greenhouse or Bullhorn?
Choose Greenhouse if mid to large companies with high-volume hiring. Choose Bullhorn if staffing and recruiting agencies needing a combined ats and client crm platform.
How much does Greenhouse cost?
Greenhouse starts at Custom pricing. Pricing model: Paid.
How much does Bullhorn cost?
Visit Bullhorn website for current pricing.
Who should use Greenhouse?
Mid to large companies with high-volume hiring
Who should use Bullhorn?
Staffing and recruiting agencies needing a combined ATS and client CRM platform